Monsters, bigger pictures and short-form video

It’s time for some links to help pass the day as you wait for the weekend to begin. Remember: when you’re reviewing this stuff, you’re still working because it’s all in the name of research.

Create a monster with Spore. This is the precursor to an EA game that’s expected to arrive shortly. The “create a spore” has been out for a while, but geez it’s fun and impressive. My monster’s name is Not-Lianimal and I’ve watched her dance, ask scared and even bite (bad monster).

Have a Flickr account? Now you can see your images full-screen without losing any resolution thanks to new site: BlowUp

And now there’s a Twitter for those who don’t write well. 12 Second TV records, well, 12 second videos. This might be a good way to practice your pitches. If you can’t encompass your idea in 12 seconds, you’re out! As the site says: “Why 12seconds?  Because anything longer is boring.” 

The service is still in private alpha, so you’ll need an invite to join for now. The creators have listed ways to get in on the alpha test.

Dr. Horrible – the horrifying math

I only call the math horrifying because I still panic when presented with simple math equations.

As I previously mentioned, Joss Whedon’s online experiment Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog is a hit.

Now someone has been nice enough to answer the age-old question “But how do we monetize this?”

Jeffrey McManus did some math on the distribution model for Whedon’s blog experiment, and while he admits it’s just an estimate, the video’s success “could signal the beginning of the end of television as the medium of the least-common-denominator and the beginning of the profitable niche market.”

Google knols a lot. Get it?

I never said this blog would be pun-free.

Google launched its answer to Wikipedia on Wednesday, Knol. “Authoritative” sources write articles and names are included. But it’s not passive, as comments and feedback are encouraged. 

It’s still very much in a beta stage, as most searches come up empty handed… unless you’re looking for medical advice. At the moment, Knol is chock full of details to instill horror for any hypochondriac.

Want more information? Here’s the Wikipedia entry on Knol. Heh.

Media Player… only in America you say

Adobe Media Player just announced a deal with Sony, allowing those who download the player to watch full movies such as Ghostbusters and complete TV shows such as 90210. OK- it’s not all retro programming. There’s CBS programming, Food Network stuff and Daily Show with Jon Stewart. That’s a little exciting. Everything is ad supported, and that’s just fine by me if it keeps the cost to me at $0. What might be better is an option to pay for the programming to ensure no ads, but perhaps that will come.

No, wait. What might be better is if I was able to watch the programming view the television programming I selected in the player. Wanting to see a clip of the Daily Show, I watched an AT&T commercial and then received a message “this video is not available in your country.” (add: I can watch movies effortlessly, it seems – Hello Ghostbusters.

Coming from the business side, I know the digital rights issues are complicated for Canadians, but speaking from the consumer side, this is getting annoying. Our neighbours to the south are getting loads of opportunities to watch programming watch television programming on various screens, and while things are improving (in that I can pay for series on iTunes), it’s not fast enough. Fortunately, I’m not the only one who feels this way.

Even when things are available in this country, consumers sometimes still feel cheated. Read the comments on iTunes for Daily Show. It is now available in Canada. Yet the pricing structure is not the same as in the States. Subscribers in America can pay a flat rate for a season ($9.99 for 16 eps), Canadians aren’t offered a pass and pay $32 to watch the same stuff. All of the comments are begging for the same pricing structure.

What’s the solution? Is it too late? Will Canada keep playing catch up? Love to hear theories…

(speaking of iTunes, Dr. Horrible’s three episodes are the top three video purchased downloads in Canada, even when the series was free on the site for a limited time – next step? DVD.)

Fallon to debut Late Night online

Lorne Michaels has decided to give Jimmy Fallon’s debut as the new Late Night talk show a testing ground – online.  Even though he won’t debut on the traditional media until Fall ’09, he’ll start his web debut in the coming months.

It’s a clever way to kick some tires before committing to a traditional TV format. Michaels told the New York Times this web-exclusivity will allow Fallon to experiment more with content. Hopefully this means the online version will actually take advantage of the internet medium and engage its viewers rather than provide passive entertainment. 

One format that should draw inspiration is the now defunct The Show with Ze Frank. Frank started the online video program as a one year experiment from March ’06 to March ’07 and I have yet to see anything like it since. Subscribers (named sportracers) dedicated themselves to help make this show even better than Ze Frank could have imagined. They directed a lot of the show content and were challenged to do things such as make the ugliest MySpace page (easy!) and create an Earth sandwich. Frank also created a social app for those fans who needed solace after The Show ended with TheOrg, which also only lasted one year.

Of course, I’d be OK with a Fallon-led passive experience if it were 5 to 10 minutes of the Barry Gibb Talk Show.

Google code, Amazon VOD and female gamers

Short tidbits…

Amazon launched a VOD service last week, Amazon Unbox. It streams over 40,000 television and movie titles, but only for US subscribers. Sigh. 

Does this mean TV and film fans will leave their cable companies en masse to download programming on Amazon? Maybe – but there’s a lot of speculation these same cablecos will stop this in its tracks with tiered broadband.  We don’t even have this service yet in Canada and we might not soon, not only because of convoluted digital TV rights, but throttled broadband is already happening in this country

Onto cooler news*, Radiohead filmed a new video for their House of Cards song without cameras, partnering with Google Code. It’s really coooool (*full disclosure, I’m a Radiohead nerd).

Finally, today I watched a woman who is technically a senior (by age only) seriously get into a game of Wii tennis. She’s part of a growing trend: Female gamers are making a mark… 40% of all gamers in the U.S. are ladies, and of that, 26% are over the age of 50.  Is that only via the casual gaming market?

All I know is I’m playing as a team in Resident Evil, and I’d play better if my hand didn’t hurt from gripping the controller so tightly when I’m blasting away zombies. I don’t have that problem with casual games. I’m such a girl.

Dr. Horrible is a wonderful experiment

Joss Whedon, that fella behind those Buffy shows everyone told me to watch 10 years ago, has done something quite amazing. He financed and created an online musical, Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog, with a distribution model that perfectly illustrates the new medium.

This is a 42-minute musical separated into 3 episodes. The first episode was released on July 15, the second on July 17 (that’s today!) and the last on the 19th. Watch these episodes for free until July 20. If you miss ‘em or want to see it again, head over to iTunes to buy the set. Believe me. There are enough fans of Whedon’s work to ensure these will be purchased.

Case in point: The first episode, available for $1.99 on iTunes when a viewer can still watch it for free on the Dr. Horrible site, was the #1 downloaded video on iTunes on July 15. 

Why does this matter? Whedon, a well sought-after TV creator chose to do the whole thing on his own dime, therefore directing the distribution model of his series. He’s giving it away for free right now, but people are still wiling to pay for it. Why? Content. Early consumers review for free and then reward his efforts buy purchasing the product. Consumers that come later in the game will do so based on the hype created by this distribution model. “People still bought it after getting it for free? I gotta see this.”

Well, that’s one theory.

It will be interesting to see how long this video remains number one on iTunes.

Returning back to more traditional co-pro models in a non-traditional medium, I’ll see what people are saying about Google AdSense’s deal with Family Guy creator Seth McFarlane for his web based series Cavalcade in my next post.

Friday links: It’s not just a computer

A recent study from Netpop research shows 36% of all entertainment is now consumed on the computer. The medium is no longer the message.

Want to up that number? Here are some fun entertaining links for Friday:

- Make Magazine not only has cool, albeit adventurous crafts to do at home, its blog recently posted a story about a table that helps show which person is dominating a conversation. Imagine you had that table in your next meeting – which person’s area would light up the most?

- Who would have thought games based on physics would be all the rage with kids and adults? Even with me! Check out this silly game, Jimmy Lost his Toilet Paper. I’m not very good at this game, but it’s a good challenge.

Owning your identity online

I have a messed up gmail account name because I didn’t get my own name in time. Some other Lianne is walking around with my gmail account! I’m sure to those with very common names this is a familiar refrain. Whether your last name is Smith or Roengfieogne (I totally just made that one up), it might be time to claim your identification online.

Why is this important? Everything is a brand now, and whether you’re applying for a new job or just talking to a prospective client, they’re likely looking up your name online to get some additional information. Also, owning your name online ensures you’re in charge of your brand. And take it from me: It’s annoying to explain why your username isn’t your name.

But where do you start? First, I have started to sign up for most new social media applications while they’re in their beta (early) stage to ensure no one else gets it as their user name… in case the application takes off. I also signed up for the two new Yahoo mail accounts, even though I’m happy with my ill monikered gmail account.

Keep it consistent. If you have one email address with a period between your first and last name, keep up that format for the other things you sign up with. I went with my first and last name as all one word.

Getting a URL in your name might not be a bad idea either, but keep in mind you’ll need to use a reputable company to buy the domain. Some clever person has already bought every single last name there is, so if Mr. Roengfieogne decides Roengfieogne.com is the way to go, he might be out of luck –  unless he wants to barter a deal on the domain name from its current owner.

While I don’t know of a company yet that will automatically enroll your name, or brand, into every new online application that pops up, there are companies that try to make this task a little easier. ClaimID lets you track where your identity is online. Within this site, they’ve created a guide to track yourself, which is pretty cool.

Viacom might want to know who you are

Google to hand over private user data to Viacom happened while I was away. Does it have serious privacy issues, or is this any different than Google having my name, email address and other personally identifiable information?

If YouTube were to immediately shut down all videos that infringed copyright, would it still remain a success? More importantly, will Viacom just launch its Comedy Central channel on YouTube already so that I can enjoy delightful Daily Show clips after this lawsuit is over?

While Google is busy working on its appeal, the internet blogs are a-buzz with speculation on what this will all mean if the data does go to Viacom. Most internet-folk believe the lawsuit has everything to do with old media not wanting to accept the digital media model. Some think Viacom will use this information to individually sue users like the music industry did a few years ago (a claim the company has denied). 

Not sure what to make of it? ZDNet has created a great Q and A.

Got more questions? Ask me and I’ll try to find an answer.