Archive for the ‘ social media ’ Category

Why Aren’t People Excited About My New Product?

Ginny Redish, the author of Letting Go of the Words, says Good Web Writing is based on usability and:

  • is like a conversation
  • answers peoples questions
  • lets people grab and go

Using this as a base, let’s look at an email alert I received this week and determine if it was successful in its digital writing to get me excited about a new product.

Who am I?:  I signed up for this newsletter because I love coupons. It’s true. No shame.

(Lesson: A pay-off will get someone to sign up for a newsletter. Coupons, recognition, additional secret information that no one else could get… If you’re creating a persona around people who sign up for your newsletters, be sure to include one who is in it to get something)

Their latest newsletter featured a link to coupons, but also prominently featured a new product. I thought maybe I’d get another pay-off if I clicked on “check it out” to learn more about the product. Why else would they want me to click on it? The newsletter blurb gave me all the information I need… why would I need to know more?

 (Lesson: Don’t automatically assume your users are as excited about your new product as you are – if you want visitors to read more on the product, provide a reason to click on the link other than ‘to provide more information.’ Also, stop using “check it out” online. Just. Stop.)

So, I clicked on the “check it out” to enter the site.  It featured lots of information about the product (which I didn’t read), rollovers on a graphic (some of which didn’t work) and links with animations to show the razor’s different features (of which I clicked on one).

(Lesson: If good web content is like a conversation, this one was one-sided. It successfully answers questions a user may have about the product, but doesn’t answer: why am I here?

The website also featured a “love it, pass it on!” link, which I thought – ok – maybe sending info will also provide a coupon. So, I clicked on it.

Who in their right mind would send their friend an email about a new razor? Really think about this… What is interesting about this?

(Lesson: Including interactivity and opportunities to share content is great – but not all content is worth sharing. Adding a pay-off “send to 5 friends for a free sample” would encourage more use of this form)

I clicked on this “buy it now” link, thinking it might be good to find out where to buy one – and maybe I’d find a deal:

So, I click Buy It Now, and the following pop-up appears:

Wait… wha? Why is it even an option?

(Lesson: Anticipate what the user will do when they come to the site. Good web writing answers a visitor’s question – not make them ask more. Also, if you offer something on your site, such as “Buy it Now!” or “See the video clip now!” it’s in your best interest to make sure the content exists every time. Also, avoid industry speak. Rather than partner online retailer, try “online shops” and let the user know where they can find it in the real world, if that option is available)

How Did This Email Campaign Do?

  • the web writing was like a conversation – not really. While there were efforts to share the information, there was no anticipation of the user’s part of conversation when they would open this site.
  • the website answered questions – the campaign answered questions the who, what and how about the razor, but did so in the well written introductory paragraph on the newsletter. It didn’t effectively anticipate the where and why questions a visitor would ask, such as “where can I buy this?” or “why am I here?”
  • the website let me grab and go – since the campaign didn’t answer real user questions, there was nothing to “go” with on this site. I could grab the link to the site and send it to a friend, but what am I grabbing and why would I share it?
Coming up – we’ll look at a e-newsletter that got its content right.

Do You Have a Social Media Policy?

Any good social media plan starts with strategizing potential reach, branding voice and user goals on Facebook, Twitter and Google+, right?  But does your team have a social media policy?

In the States, the FTC implemented a Social Media Policy to thwart unsavoury attempts by some companies that chose to not be transparent in their social strategies (I tried to find a similar policy from the CRTC in Canada, but no luck – let me know if one exists). Working with your legal team, creating a Social Media Policy for your company could prevent a lot of issues down the road.

WOMMA, the Word-of-Mouth Marketing Association  was featured in the latest issue of Chief Content Officer and its article interviewing Gary Spangler, marketing manager at Dupont. Spangler advises people to start any social media campaign with WOMMA as they offer essential elements to build an effective policy. Here is a screengrab from an article with some good tips (and be sure to click on the image to read more from the Chief Content Officer magazine – it’s a good read):

WOMMA Social Media Policy, Chief Content Officer Magazine, July 2011

Click on the image to read Chief Content Officer magazine, July 2011


How to Correct Social Media Errors

This is a great article from PBS’s MediaShift on how to correct mistakes on social media.

MediaShift . How to Correct Social Media Errors | PBS.

Quick overview:

- Neither Facebook or Twitter offer a suggestion on how correct a poorly written post. Pundits suggest these services, or a third party app, need to create a functionality that lets users correct errors and notify anyone who retweeted the erroneous message (great idea for budding API developers!)

- Google+ allows users to edit posts and lists the date and time of the change.

Made a mistake? Best practices include:

- capture the error with a screengrab

- acknowledge the mistake and reference the error

- send tweets and messages to let those who shared or retweeted the error

If your social media mistake is offensive to some readers, and/or potential brand damaging, read this about Kenneth Cole’s rebound, and this, about Bing’s approach.

 


The web in 60 seconds

60 Seconds - Things That Happen On Internet Every Sixty Seconds
Infographic by- Shanghai Web Designers


Like Me and I’ll Give You Something!

Did you ever see (in a movie or in real life) a young nerdy kid try to bribe “popular kids” for friendships by giving them things? “Oh, I heard you really like Sprite so I got you the last one from the fridge.” Remember how the cool kids would usually react? That’s right – with heart-wrenching indifference.

So why has Facebook changed all of that?

Every day, I receive requests to Like a brand or product on Facebook to get a coupon. It’s not only the fastest way for the industry to minimize the potential analytics and sincere word-of-mouth goldmine of a Facebook Like –  but it’s shocking because many of us very cool people are falling for it. It’s like we’re gladly taking a free can of pop from the annoying kid at school and not only thanking them for it, but promising to let everyone know -publicly – that we think this annoying kid is actually the coolest ever.

Seems kind of lazy to me.

Are the popular kids (us) just willing to put up anything on our profile (and our friends walls) in exchange for something free?


Google +1

“The web’s a big place: sometimes it helps to have a tour guide.”

This is the thought behind Google’s recently launched social recommendation engine, +1. If you like a link on Google, click the +1 button and your friends will know you like that site. Similar to Facebook’s “like” button? You bet – except Google’s social feature has the capacity to reach a different group of people than those on your Facebook.

The +1 button will recommend sites to people in your Gmail, Google Reader, Google buzz and other Google contact lists you identify.  It’ll benefit companies who eventually choose to add this feature on their website, as the more +1s, presumably the better your standing with Google’s rank. It’s also a nice new algorithm that helps Google searches move away from content farms that have been dominating their results lately.

If you want to try it out, visit this area on Google. And anyone in children’s media who think this might be a way for kids to become involved legally in social media… sorry. You still need to be 13 or older to be part of the Google community.


Facebook Questions

As I write this blog post, a very simple poll question, Mac or PC, has received over 2 million (!) votes on Facebook’s new Questions app.  Thanks to this new feature, everyone on Facebook now has the option to easily post a poll – and this includes anyone with a company fan page. Yes, even you. But is it something you should use?

One of the reasons why “Mac or PC” is getting so many responses is because it’s a quick question with a quick answer – and that’s something to keep in mind if you’re deciding to venture into Questions for your business. Don’t ask long, convoluted questions because you won’t get much response. Another key: while it’s good to get a gauge on what your fans are thinking, consider your audience. Do you want to ask questions that only your fans would know, or can you adjust your verbiage to introduce new users to your fan page/brand.

Questions is a great promotional tool for your Facebook page. When a fan decides to answer your poll, their vote is posted on their wall – prompting their friends to also answer the question and perhaps, end up as a fan of your FB page. If your poll is so specific that only your fans could answer, this might be a missed opportunity to capture some new traffic. But again, it depends on what information you’ll looking to gather.

So… early stage take aways:

- Keep it short (quick question, maybe two choices tops)

- Consider keeping it generic so anyone can answer to add fans to your FB page

Love to hear any other tips – please share!


A Lesson on Social Media Damage Control, Take Two

During the protests in Egypt, designer Kenneth Cole was given a strong lesson in how not to use recent events on Twitter to self promote, and thanks to some quick actions and ownership of his mistake, recovered. Now Microsoft may need to look to the designer for some damage control lessons.

After the horrible earthquake and tsunami in Japan, Microsoft’s Bing search engine posted a ‘retweet’ challenge – they will donte $1 for every @bing retweet up to $100,000 for quake victims.

Oops. Backlash started pretty quickly as people accused Microsoft of using the disaster to promote their search engine and their “corporate citizenship” page, which shows how Microsoft is helping Japan.

Meanwhile, Bing’s competitor Google created a popular people finder for those trying to find friends and relatives in the disaster, and released their satellite images to help resources on the ground find those in the most amount of danger. No retweet challenge or marketing plan needed because these services are worthwhile and deployed during times of need.

Bing’s Twitter team later apologized for their tweet, claiming their intention was to make it easy for people to donate to the cause. Their original tweet, however, was not deleted and continues to be retweeted, even by Bing’s celebrity spokespeople like Ryan Seacrest. In other words, this marketing plan continues despite admitting to an error.

You may remember something like this happened only a few weeks ago when designer Kenneth Cole tweeted inappropriately that the protests in Egypt were actually people excited about his new collection. He quickly recovered from this by owning up to the mistake, removing the original tweet and stating it was his personal error. No excuses.

How can Microsoft recover?

- delete the RT challenge tweet

- add “how to donate” to their Bing homepage

- use their expertise to create a tool that helps the cause

Is this a marketing fail by Microsoft, or just a misguided attempt to raise awareness of how to donate funds to the cause? How else could Microsoft help? While you’re thinking of this, please also consider donating as there’s nothing worse than analyzing a company’s $100K donation when you haven’t given anything yourself.

How to donate:

Canadians wishing to help support relief efforts underway are encouraged to contribute by:

  • Donating online
  • Calling 1-800-418-1111
  • By texting the word ASIA to 30333 to make a one-time donation of $5*
  • By contacting their local Red Cross office. Cheques should be made payable to the Canadian Red Cross, earmarked “Japan Earthquake/Asia-Pacific Tsunami” and mailed to the Canadian Red Cross National Office, 170 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 2P2.

Americans can donate: text REDCROSS to 90999 to make a $10 donation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Let’s Make a Viral Video

It seems the team behind Smart Water had someone tell them “let’s make a viral video.”

I had a hard time watching this. Why?

- it uses only her celebrity to make it viral
- it uses pre-established memes rather than coming up with something original
- it’s, as someone wrote, “Jay Leno” funny
- if you’re going to make fun of internet memes, tip your hat to them, don’t belittle. Here’s an example:

And this is how you make a good viral video:

Why?
- high production values
- well written song and great direction
- content is relatable and directed to its intended audience
- it’s not “Jay Leno” funny


Live Chat on Convore

First, there was Quora – a site that sparked immediate interest from digital pundits for its professional spin on a simple question and answer format. It proved popular at first, particularly from the technologically-savvy bunch because it focuses on high quality answers from well respected people in their fields.

Now, there’s Convore, a site that takes the Quora concept and turns it into live chat.

Basically, you create groups formed around a topic you’d like to discuss. So, I recently set up a group called Toronto- Interactive and posed a question – whatcha working on? I can invite my friends on Twitter or Facebook to join the site and participate in a live conversation, or I can join other groups and speak to international experts in the fields of tech, user experience, etc. You can even set up private groups, so if you’re working on a project with a group of people, you can set up live chats on this site.

Group chats are nothing new, but this site is free, easy to use and so far seems to be nicely focused on the topic at hand. It’s also a great research tool and a way to chat instantly about your favourite things. This TV Discussion, for example, separates each conversation by TV show.

So far, the site is interesting because it’s small and manageable. It’s also easy to see where your social media friends are chatting, which is a great feature. Let me know what you think of this in the comments.