Archive for the ‘ digital vs analogue media ’ Category

Google code, Amazon VOD and female gamers

Short tidbits…

Amazon launched a VOD service last week, Amazon Unbox. It streams over 40,000 television and movie titles, but only for US subscribers. Sigh. 

Does this mean TV and film fans will leave their cable companies en masse to download programming on Amazon? Maybe – but there’s a lot of speculation these same cablecos will stop this in its tracks with tiered broadband.  We don’t even have this service yet in Canada and we might not soon, not only because of convoluted digital TV rights, but throttled broadband is already happening in this country

Onto cooler news*, Radiohead filmed a new video for their House of Cards song without cameras, partnering with Google Code. It’s really coooool (*full disclosure, I’m a Radiohead nerd).

Finally, today I watched a woman who is technically a senior (by age only) seriously get into a game of Wii tennis. She’s part of a growing trend: Female gamers are making a mark… 40% of all gamers in the U.S. are ladies, and of that, 26% are over the age of 50.  Is that only via the casual gaming market?

All I know is I’m playing as a team in Resident Evil, and I’d play better if my hand didn’t hurt from gripping the controller so tightly when I’m blasting away zombies. I don’t have that problem with casual games. I’m such a girl.


Dr. Horrible is a wonderful experiment

Joss Whedon, that fella behind those Buffy shows everyone told me to watch 10 years ago, has done something quite amazing. He financed and created an online musical, Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog, with a distribution model that perfectly illustrates the new medium.

This is a 42-minute musical separated into 3 episodes. The first episode was released on July 15, the second on July 17 (that’s today!) and the last on the 19th. Watch these episodes for free until July 20. If you miss ‘em or want to see it again, head over to iTunes to buy the set. Believe me. There are enough fans of Whedon’s work to ensure these will be purchased.

Case in point: The first episode, available for $1.99 on iTunes when a viewer can still watch it for free on the Dr. Horrible site, was the #1 downloaded video on iTunes on July 15. 

Why does this matter? Whedon, a well sought-after TV creator chose to do the whole thing on his own dime, therefore directing the distribution model of his series. He’s giving it away for free right now, but people are still wiling to pay for it. Why? Content. Early consumers review for free and then reward his efforts buy purchasing the product. Consumers that come later in the game will do so based on the hype created by this distribution model. “People still bought it after getting it for free? I gotta see this.”

Well, that’s one theory.

It will be interesting to see how long this video remains number one on iTunes.

Returning back to more traditional co-pro models in a non-traditional medium, I’ll see what people are saying about Google AdSense’s deal with Family Guy creator Seth McFarlane for his web based series Cavalcade in my next post.


Friday links: It’s not just a computer

A recent study from Netpop research shows 36% of all entertainment is now consumed on the computer. The medium is no longer the message.

Want to up that number? Here are some fun entertaining links for Friday:

- Make Magazine not only has cool, albeit adventurous crafts to do at home, its blog recently posted a story about a table that helps show which person is dominating a conversation. Imagine you had that table in your next meeting – which person’s area would light up the most?

- Who would have thought games based on physics would be all the rage with kids and adults? Even with me! Check out this silly game, Jimmy Lost his Toilet Paper. I’m not very good at this game, but it’s a good challenge.


Viacom might want to know who you are

Google to hand over private user data to Viacom happened while I was away. Does it have serious privacy issues, or is this any different than Google having my name, email address and other personally identifiable information?

If YouTube were to immediately shut down all videos that infringed copyright, would it still remain a success? More importantly, will Viacom just launch its Comedy Central channel on YouTube already so that I can enjoy delightful Daily Show clips after this lawsuit is over?

While Google is busy working on its appeal, the internet blogs are a-buzz with speculation on what this will all mean if the data does go to Viacom. Most internet-folk believe the lawsuit has everything to do with old media not wanting to accept the digital media model. Some think Viacom will use this information to individually sue users like the music industry did a few years ago (a claim the company has denied). 

Not sure what to make of it? ZDNet has created a great Q and A.

Got more questions? Ask me and I’ll try to find an answer.


 

 


Why television execs can never ask “where do people find the time?”

The short speech by Here Comes Everybody author Clay Shirky from the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco is brilliant. Why? It explains the shift in audience media interaction in a light and funny way.  And it’s a good first-post for my blog.

Clay Shirky at Web 2.0 Conference in San Francisco

What makes this important? ”Media that’s targeted at you but doesn’t include you may not be worth sitting still for.” 

(Also, who knew there were gin pushcarts in London back in the day?) 

Phrases this will teach you: Cognitive Surplus, Social Surplus, Architecture of Participation

And yes, I’m fully aware it seems strange my first post to a blog called For Your Reading Pleasure directs you to a video, so here is the transcript.