Author Archive

Amazon gets into the Kids TV business

Amazon put out an open call today for series creators and producers to pitch a kids show (ages 2 through 14) to go through an incubator. The selected pitch would receive $10K and development support. The developed series will secure $50K and up to 5% of merch. The series will be part of Amazon’s new Instant Video offering.

 

Here’s a link to the FAQs. Some interesting highlights:

If Amazon Studios produces my series, what role will I have in the production?

Your role will be determined over the course of development and at the time of production. Amazon Studios has an open door, so this is difficult to specify in advance as creators may have different skills and experience levels.

How do rights work in the Amazon Studios Development Agreement?

 Original Properties Submitted for Private Review

If you upload an original script for private review, Amazon Studios gets three important things with respect to your work:

  • The exclusive right to buy it (and its associated rights) during the 45-day term of the option, for $200,000 if it is a movie script and for $55,000 if it is a script for an episodic series, plus other possible bonuses. The 45-day option and evaluation period restarts each time you submit a revision to the project, even if the initial 45-day period has ended. We can also extend this option for two additional 18-month periods by paying you $10,000 for each extension. If we extend the option, we will receive all of the rights we receive for properties submitted for public review, as described below.
  • The right to review it during the option term (without sharing it outside of Amazon Studios and its subcontractors).
  • The right to include the title and premise of it in a game on or off Amazon Studios that is intended to solicit audience feedback, like the “Premise War” game currently at Amazon Studios.

And you keep four things with respect to your work:

  • The right to continue to revise it until we exercise the option (if we exercise the option).
  • The right during the option term to write one novel, comic book or other book based on your work, and the right to publish that book and any other books you first published before the work was on Amazon Studios. If we exercise the option, you keep those publishing rights, but you may not write any other books based on the work.
  • If you are a stand-up comic, the right to perform stand-up comedy based on a character from your work. You may also record and distribute those performances, but only until we exercise the option.
  • The non-exclusive right to publish and perform your original songs from the work, but only if your work is not a musical.

 

And here’s a link to the Development Agreement.

I find the open call approach, rather than reaching out to established producers, an interesting angle. I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this development. What do you think of the “up to 5% of merch” deal? Were you approached by Amazon? Is this a fair deal for the producer?


When Bad Mobile Strategy Happens to Silly People

 

The City of Toronto announced an app today to help citizens reach its “311″ information service, and it’s being promoted as an easy way to take a picture graffiti and send it to the government so it can be cleaned up.

The app costs $1.99.

While a portion of the money will go to support the library, you may ask yourself “why on earth would I pay $2 to download an app when I can do it for free?”

Exactly.

The most important thing to ask yourself with any digital endeavour is WHY. If you cannot answer the WHY, the product should not be made.

Why would someone download this app when your Apple iPhone will easily take pictures and attach them to outgoing email?

Why would someone download this app over calling Toronto’s information line: 311?

Why release this app only on iPhone?

Why would a citizen report graffiti on their iPhone when the average person who may complain is elderly and may not feel comfortable sending information via their mobile?

Etc.

At least it’s not a QR code campaign.


Why Your Web Content Isn’t Credible

A couple of years ago, Google was in a pickle. A search for a common phrase would often result in spammy content farm lists rather than real articles from professionals. While Google has made some strides to re-establish its stake as a reliable search leader, us users may be feeling a little burned.

Content Science released a study recently that shows 65% of web users deem its content unreliable, and most people need to rely on recommendations from experts or someone they know to determine credibility.

Content Reliability infographic

So, more people than ever are using the web to find unreliable content.

What can we learn from this?

- When you’re creating content for the web, think about influence

- Think like a journalist. If you’re creating content, you need to back up your claims with reliable sources

- Engage in social media. Answer questions posed by your followers and consider what elements of your content is ‘sharable’

- Be likeable and personable in your posts. You are not a robot!

- Make sure what you write is original and creates an emotional response beyond boredom

- Measure your results! Are people reading your content? Have there been social media shares? Keep track of the analytics and analyze to help improve your site.

 

 

 

Following these key steps can help improve your chances to be influential and credible content.  Need help? Ping me and I can help you get started.

 

 

 


The Muppets show pitch to CBS

Discovered a gem today – someone on YouTube posted the original Muppets show pitch to CBS.

In just over two-and-a-half minutes, Jim Henson produced one of the best TV pitches I’ve seen (I’m biased because I grew up on this show), and must have been a hard sell considering it’s a primetime series starring puppets. Today, of course, he would have needed to include a blurb about the digital, cross-media plans. Would he have called us digital lovers egg-heads or  ”Freaky long-haired dirty cynical hippies”?

Do you think this would have worked today?


Shifting social TV for those without Cable

Social TV for cable cuttersIn Cannes recently, a number of top execs gathered to learn everything there is to know about social television – the act of adding the social networking experience to TV watching. Think: adding a hashtag to your live event.  Twitter UK’s top exec told the attendees that social television is happening, whether they want it to or not.  This is true, but maybe the focus should shift slightly.

As the industry works to better personalize the broadcast experience for its viewers, from adding full length content on their own websites to selling their catalogue rights to Netflix, there will be an increased marketing challenge to help audiences find their programs. Why? Because for those of us without cable,  it’s challenging to know what shows to watch because there’s no lead-in from a top rated show, or because programmers are selling preroll ad spaces to legitimate companies, not filling it with in-house advertising to promote their latest show (for the most part).

I find my shows by listening to podcasts, reading tweets (beyond a Get Glue check-in), or overhearing what colleagues are watching. I’m more compelled to watch a show when I see most people on my Twitter feed are tuned in versus seeing a big box ad for the program.  In fact, seeing everyone watch a program live makes me twinge a little for ye olde days of cable because there’s a community building on social media I can’t be a part of because I can’t see the show. I’m missing out.

So, how do you do start a social TV campaign?

- take part in some social listening. What are people saying on Twitter or Facebook about you? About your competition? Gather the data and think up a fun angle to build a community. There are free and paid-for ways to gather this type of data, from Google Alerts to customized packages.

- don’t ask your coordinator to handle your social TV just because he/she is always on Facebook. Hire a professional and check their credentials. Have they created a social media campaign before? Do they understand and take part in social TV?

- Don’t rely only on Get Glue, Miso or other social TV check-in sites. They’re good for creating a reminder to watch, but take the community to the next level now that you know they’re tuning in.

- Let the conversation happen organically – viewers can sense a fake tweet from a mile away. If your staff is writing tweets to support your program, be 100% transparent.

- Concerned about people revealing spoilers? Those without cable are used to hearing the ending of shows – doesn’t mean we’re not going to still watch it. In fact, sometimes letting your fans leak the spoilers results in more people watching.

- Keep your fans interested by holding fun hashtag games on Twitter. Ru Paul’s Drag Race asks its fans to come up with ’70s drag names between broadcasts, for example.

- Don’t rely on contests to build your community. People who enter contests tend to jump in and out without full engagement. Make it rewarding to talk about your show with retweets and engage them in conversations.

Any other tips? Let me know in the comments.


Social Media and Research for the TV exec

Shaw Canada recently signed a deal for Get Glue in Canada to check-in to Canadian shows such as Top Chef Canada and Real Housewives of Vancouver.  Personally, I’m surprised it took this long for a deal to happen. The most interesting side effect, however, is the international attention it’s drawing to Canadian formats and the insights it’s sharing.

Top Chef Canada, of course, if the north-of-the-border equivalent to Top Chef in the States. It has a strong following in Canada already, and the Get Glue connection is helping fans speak to each other. More interesting are the number of comments from those in the U.S. asking when they can watch the show.

While there’s not an overwhelming demand, there’s now awareness that the format exists in Canada, and international fans want a chance to see it and watch it online. This is great ammunition for the TV distributor.

With the right amount of research and a establishing strong competitive review basics, Get Glue, other entertainment based check-in apps, and social media channels tell TV producers and distributors a lot about the fans of their show. There’s even a YouTube series featuring a group of friends watching and reacting to Downton Abbey. This is data that’s accessible, sometimes cheeky, and can speak to how you decide to sell your program internationally, promote the show on your channel or approach character development for the next season.

Social media listening can be challenging to manage, but there are some external companies such as Canada’s Sysmos that can filter out useful information. Having a person dedicated to reviewing your social data on a regular basis – both TV shows you’re in charge of and the competition- helps give you an edge and keeps you in touch with the end-user – your fans.


Three Words: “Can’t you Just…”

“Can’t You Just” and its equally evil cousin “Can You Just” can be applied to any profession. It’s when someone believes they’re providing a simple solution to a complex problem. Here’s a perfect example written from a designer, pulled from the hilarious website, Clients From Hell.

While a lot of people in the tech industry are on the receiving end of these three words, it can happen at any time to anyone. “Can’t you just use Photoshop?” “Can’t you just do just hire the writers from the Simpsons for your new TV show?” “Can’t you just build another Facebook?”

What are your best “Can’t you just” moments? Share in the comments…


Hey! People Are Excited About My New Product!

Following up on yesterdays “Why Aren’t People Excited About My New Product?,” here’s an example of a newsletter I received that has the potential to get users excited through Good Web Writing.

As explained yesterday, Good Web Writing:

  • is part of a conversation
  • answers questions
  • lets people grab and go

Who am I? I still sign up for newsletters to get deals.

I open this email, which tells me “Congratulations! As a member, you have access to this brand new program,” giving me an opportunity to pass along discounts to families and friends, while also earning rewards.

(Lesson: This email answered questions effectively. Who? Me and My Friends. What? A discount and promo code. Where? Online shopping. When? Now – though I don’t know when this offer ends. How? Get my friends to buy a kit so I get a gift. Why am I here? You’ll get a discount or a gift certificate, even if I don’t want the product.)

I click on the Tell Me More because in the email, there is no way to sign up for the project without clicking on the link to the site. My main goal in heading to this site is to learn how to send the deal to my friends.

(Lesson: I’m taken directly to the area of the site I wanted to go to, without a preamble sales pitch. The conversation element is there – lots of headings posed as questions, the option to sign in is in the first person (log in to my SKINID) and the graphic showing has speech bubbles to remind me of the special and subconsciously emphasize the conversational element of the deal)

The only question I have is “what is my SKINID? Is it a different log in than what I used for the newsletter?” I try to enter in the account details I use for my newsletter, but it doesn’t recognize it – so, I guess I need to sign up for something new if I want the gift certificate or the discount. Worth it? Depends on the user (me).

How Did This Email Campaign Do?

  • The website was part of a conversation - absolutely. By creating digital copy that uses questions to help guide the user through the process, this site is simple and engaging.
  • The website answered questions - For the most part. While the SKINID membership is a puzzler (why would someone have that if it’s a new product?), everything was explained – the who, what, where, when, why and how. A user knew why they were on this site, whether they planned to follow through with the offer or not.
  • The website let me grab and go - Again, for the most part. By needing to sign up for a new membership, it created a step that didn’t let me immediately grab and go. But props to the designers and content strategists who brought the user right to the information about the campaign rather than forcing then through content about the promoted product. It trusted that, if I were interested in learning more, I could find the information in myself the navigation.
Of course, not every product has the budget to offer gift certificates and deep discounts to get users to try out a new product, but any new online promotion – be it for a new product, service, TV show, or game – can draw inspiration from a well executed campaign and tailor it to meet their goals.

Why Aren’t People Excited About My New Product?

Ginny Redish, the author of Letting Go of the Words, says Good Web Writing is based on usability and:

  • is like a conversation
  • answers peoples questions
  • lets people grab and go

Using this as a base, let’s look at an email alert I received this week and determine if it was successful in its digital writing to get me excited about a new product.

Who am I?:  I signed up for this newsletter because I love coupons. It’s true. No shame.

(Lesson: A pay-off will get someone to sign up for a newsletter. Coupons, recognition, additional secret information that no one else could get… If you’re creating a persona around people who sign up for your newsletters, be sure to include one who is in it to get something)

Their latest newsletter featured a link to coupons, but also prominently featured a new product. I thought maybe I’d get another pay-off if I clicked on “check it out” to learn more about the product. Why else would they want me to click on it? The newsletter blurb gave me all the information I need… why would I need to know more?

 (Lesson: Don’t automatically assume your users are as excited about your new product as you are – if you want visitors to read more on the product, provide a reason to click on the link other than ‘to provide more information.’ Also, stop using “check it out” online. Just. Stop.)

So, I clicked on the “check it out” to enter the site.  It featured lots of information about the product (which I didn’t read), rollovers on a graphic (some of which didn’t work) and links with animations to show the razor’s different features (of which I clicked on one).

(Lesson: If good web content is like a conversation, this one was one-sided. It successfully answers questions a user may have about the product, but doesn’t answer: why am I here?

The website also featured a “love it, pass it on!” link, which I thought – ok – maybe sending info will also provide a coupon. So, I clicked on it.

Who in their right mind would send their friend an email about a new razor? Really think about this… What is interesting about this?

(Lesson: Including interactivity and opportunities to share content is great – but not all content is worth sharing. Adding a pay-off “send to 5 friends for a free sample” would encourage more use of this form)

I clicked on this “buy it now” link, thinking it might be good to find out where to buy one – and maybe I’d find a deal:

So, I click Buy It Now, and the following pop-up appears:

Wait… wha? Why is it even an option?

(Lesson: Anticipate what the user will do when they come to the site. Good web writing answers a visitor’s question – not make them ask more. Also, if you offer something on your site, such as “Buy it Now!” or “See the video clip now!” it’s in your best interest to make sure the content exists every time. Also, avoid industry speak. Rather than partner online retailer, try “online shops” and let the user know where they can find it in the real world, if that option is available)

How Did This Email Campaign Do?

  • the web writing was like a conversation – not really. While there were efforts to share the information, there was no anticipation of the user’s part of conversation when they would open this site.
  • the website answered questions – the campaign answered questions the who, what and how about the razor, but did so in the well written introductory paragraph on the newsletter. It didn’t effectively anticipate the where and why questions a visitor would ask, such as “where can I buy this?” or “why am I here?”
  • the website let me grab and go – since the campaign didn’t answer real user questions, there was nothing to “go” with on this site. I could grab the link to the site and send it to a friend, but what am I grabbing and why would I share it?
Coming up – we’ll look at a e-newsletter that got its content right.

How Do You Use An Apostrophe?

A lot of people still aren’t familiar with how to use an apostrophe correctly. This type of grammar mistake on your website can make you look unprofessional and elicit a stern eyeball rolling from grammar nerds like me.

I have a solution!

Apostrophe Abuse is a collection of pictures and links demonstrating misuses of this common punctuation mark.

I’m serious – follow this site on Google Reader and look it regularly. You’ll start to understand how to use an apostrophe correctly in your digital writing by regularly seeing how often the mistakes are made. Eventually, you too will roll your eyes at poor apostrophe use! Join me, won’t you?

If you’re still not clear on how to use an apostrophe correctly, check out these references:

- The Oatmeal – How to Use an Apostrophe

- Grammar Girl Video on Daily Motion

- Electric Company – N Apostrophe T